ONE MAN IN THE OVAL OFFICE IS REDEFINING WHAT GENDER MEANS AND LAYING THE GROUND-WORK FOR AN ENTIRELY NEW THIRD GENDER CALLED "THE UNISEX GENDER," FOR THIS IS WHAT THE LGBT MOVEMENT WANT OUR SOCIETY TO CHANGE INTO - WHERE BOTH SEXES MERGE INTO ONE -AND NO ONE IS DISCRIMINATED, EXCEPT THOSE WHO SPEAK THE TRUTH!
Our world is becoming increasingly dangerous and uncertain as the U.S Government is pursuing the LGBT agenda, absolutely. It is willing to place transgenders rights before children's and women's rights of privacy and safety; On Friday 13th May, 2016, President Obama sent directives to all U.S. schools telling them that they must allow any child to use their facilities by the gender of the child's choice not by birth - this means if a boy wants to be a girl he can ask to be regarded as a girl, and the school and teachers must address him by his new pronoun and let him shower with the girl's and use the girl's toilets, or else the school risks losing their federal funding for school meals and other education programs; President Obama tweaked an old 1972 law to open up all toilets for both sexes for the sake of transgenders or any one who identifies himself or herself as a transgender. In other words, he has changed the law by interpreting a 1972 Richard Nixon law of anti-discrimination on the basis of gender by arbitrarily changing the word "sex" in the old law to "gender" in his interpreation, so that anti-discrimination based on sex includes gender anti-discrimination; this means this law has been re-written (arbitrarily by Mr. Obama) without the authorisation of Congress and means that the LGBT have got what they demanded and lobbied Mr. Obama to do.
Think about that - a President - one man - made a discision on behalf of an entire nation about an issue as big as creating a new kind of gender, and encouraging all children to think that they can choose their own gender and over-rule nature!
Now any boy can walk into his principal's office and tell his principal that he wants to be a "girl" and so he would like to use the girl's shower room, toilet or changing room, and shower with the girl's! And under Federal law, he would be protected. And if that Principal refused his request, that boy and his parents could pursue proceedings and sue.
PRESIDENT OBAMA IS SHOWING HIMSELF TO BE THE MOST EXTREME LIBERAL PRESIDENT
President Obama, in his pursuit of the LGBT agenda, is willing to sacrifice the greater good of human rights of safety and privacy, for the transgenders rights. If he had been more presidential, he would have balanced the transgender rights with the religious folks rights, but instead they, along with all children and straight-sex gender adults are suffering and are being stripped of their rights. The Obama administration is willing to collude with the LGBT movement no matter what it costs the majority of American children in their emotional wellbeing and health, in order to protect a tiny minority. Of course, all people deserve compassion but in this real world we need to balance the LGBT rights with religious folk's rights. But why does the majority have to suffer for the sake of the minority - that is wrong and un-presidential? in Obama's liberal ideology to ensure all anti-discrimination laws protect every one of the LGBT community, the majority of Americans are having their privacy rights taken from under their noses, rights which were fought with blood! It is setting back basic privacy and safety human rights over one hundred years.
And what will it mean for the children's future? it will means thousands and thousands of more cases of transgender issues now that the question of gender is being changed into fluidity as they receive the wrong message that our gender can be defined by their individual minds rather than by nature, biologically, or by God, which is a blatant lie, in opposition to the truth!
Because of these new so called anti-discrimination laws and the re-writing of them by Mr. Obama and his collegues, religious folks would be forced to violate their conscience and religious rights to follow the law, otherwise face law suits sponsored by the Government, with huge fines attached, if found to have broken Federal laws - which they already have.
In a fair society, leaders would not allow one section of society to set the agenda at the expense of another like this, but would try and balance the rights of the LGBT community with the religious folks. But Mr. Obama has not chosen to be Presidential but to follow his own liberal opinion, absolutely, and support absolutely the LGBT movement. Now we have reached the Topsy-Turvey position where religious folks are being asked to violate their conscience to keep the law - and that's just plain wrong.
The Obama Government is overeaching into local States education programs and, where traditionally these kind of issues were taken care of by local authorities, now Mr. Obama is dictating his narrow liberal agenda. For example, when in special cases there occurred some local issue of a transgender in a school, then that case would be dealt with at the very local level and by the schoo Board, with upmost care, in almost all cases. But now Mr. Obama is forcing his narrow vision, which represents 0.03% onto the majority 97.7 % of our society. In the same way as when just five U.S. Supreme Court judges forced their liberal will onto 320 million U.S. citizens and decided arbitrary that the 14th ammendment of equality includes marriage provisions for same-sex couples; and that is also just plain wrong and means those judges have become "despots" along with President Obama (Supreme Dictator).
Such important issues should be dealt with by Congress. Where questions of national sexuality and same-sex marriage would have to be passed through Congress, increasingly these most important questions are being dealt with by pure "despots" such as nine Supreme court judges or the Supreme Dictator he has become, President Borack Obama. The Obama Committee of Politicians and Judges are williing to sacrifice our children's and women's rights to ensure transgenders are not discriminated against in any place or environment. Thus, nowadays, the school environment is listed as the most dangerous place where more abuse is reported than any other place.
As each sides of this argument dig deeper in their ideological trench, what is apparent is this argument needs a large injection of common sense.
As both sides of this argument cannot agree, then we need a great dollop of common sense and move to the more important issue of what we are all agreed on, or at least what we shoild all agree on:
We need to show everyone compassion, privacy and safety.
========================================================================
The following article was written by a real sexually abused victim who explains in her own words and from her own experience the real dangers that these new bathroom laws pose yo everyone's privacy and sagety. She brings some really important dollops of wisdom and who asks some good questions and gives some good advice. A Link to where she wrote this article -the Site - is given first
http://thefederalist.com/2015/11/23/a-rape-survivor-speaks-out-about-transgender-bathrooms/
A Rape Survivor Speaks Out About Transgender Bathrooms
There’s no way to make everyone happy about transgender bathrooms and locker rooms. So the priority ought to be finding a way to keep everyone safe.
By Kaeley Triller
NOVEMBER 23, 2015
A few months ago, I registered for “The Story Workshop” at the Allender Center in Seattle. Primarily aimed at helping survivors of sexual abuse find the purpose and weight in their fractured personal narratives, the conference promised to be intense but deeply healing.
So when three unrelated friends randomly mailed me substantial checks with notes that said, “I don’t know why, but I think God wants me to give this to you” all within the same week, I took the hint and signed up for the workshop. I had been waiting more than seven years.
I don’t know exactly what I expected. I was naively hopeful that I would get a few good writing tips that would enable me to beautify my past and approach it like one of Aesop’s fables—third-person fiction with a perfect little moral at the end of the story.
Hating the Little Girl I Once WasThat’s not what happened. One of the pre-assignments was to write 700 words about a painful childhood memory. I was surprised at the one I chose. It wasn’t a heavy hitter, so to speak. I wrote about a Polaroid picture I kept rediscovering in a shoebox at my parents’ house, and my inability to figure out why looking at it made me want to rip it to shreds.
I’m about ten years old in the picture, with scraggly hair, pale skin, and a vacant expression. I’m wearing my mom’s oversized knit sweater and Oxford shoes my dad had bought me. In my hands is a piece of green felt I’d cut into the shape of New York for a school report about a U.S. state. Coincidentally or not, New York is the place my abuser had recently moved. I think I wanted to be closer to him. Don’t try to understand it. I still don’t.
‘Why do you hate the little girl in that picture so much?’
My small group dissected the story with grace and insight that could only be offered by those who spoke the same horrific language of shame and rage and grief. I felt nothing as I spoke about it. “It is what it is,” I remember saying, committed to my ambivalence. My group leader brushed away a tear and said, “Kaeley, this story breaks my heart. Why do you hate the little girl in that picture so much?” I couldn’t access her understanding or her empathy. I recognized the accuracy of her assessment, but I didn’t know how to change it.
Later that evening, one of the workshop presenters tasked us with a seemingly benign activity. We were instructed to play with crayons and miniature tubs of play dough on the tables in front of us. I hated these types of exercises. I thought they were such a waste of time. I reached for a purple crayon and reluctantly complied. I drew a picture of a flower and rolled a snake out of my play dough. And I burst into tears.
Someone Protect This Little GirlThe invitation to engage as a child had revealed my whole dilemma: I didn’t hate the little girl in the photo. I hated her need. I hated her anonymity. I hated the visible proof that she loved her abuser. I hated that she didn’t know any better, that it took her another ten years to figure out why she still slept with the light on and showered in her underwear and vigilantly lined the crack under the bathroom door with a beach towel and destroyed her teeth with gum she relentlessly chewed as a means of escaping the recollection of his breath on her face. I hated that he fooled her. He fooled everybody. He was really good.
She still slept with the light on and showered in her underwear and vigilantly lined the crack under the bathroom door with a beach towel.
“Wake up!” I wanted to scream at her. “Can’t you see what’s going on? Dosomething about it!”
It’s the same desperate inclination I’m fighting today. Everywhere I read in the news, there’s talk of another school or gym or business that is boldly adopting “progressive” new locker room policies designed to create equal rights for people who identify as transgender. These policies allow transgender individuals to use the locker room consistent with the sex they identify as their own, regardless of anatomy.
While some have proposed a third option for transgender people (single-occupancy restrooms and showers), this option has been largely struck down, and employees are prohibited from suggesting it, as it is considered discriminatory and emotionally damaging to a group of people who are working so hard to fit in. The solution? Anyone can use whatever restroom he or she wants without being questioned.
Victimizers Use Any Opening They Can FindI read these reports, and my heart starts to race. They can’t be serious. Let me be clear: I am not saying that transgender people are predators. Not by a long shot. What I am saying is that there are countless deviant men in this world who will pretend to be transgender as a means of gaining access to the people they want to exploit, namely women and children. It already happens. Just Google Jason Pomares, Norwood Smith Burnes, or Taylor Buehler, for starters.
There are countless deviant men in this world who will pretend to be transgender as a means of gaining access to the people they want to exploit.
While I feel a deep sense of empathy for what must be a very difficult situation for transgender people, at the beginning and end of the day, it is nothing short of negligent to instate policies that elevate the emotional comfort of a relative few over the physical safety of a large group of vulnerable people.
Don’t they know anything about predators? Don’t they know the numbers? That out of every 100 rapes, only two rapists will spend so much as single day in jail while the other 98 walk free and hang out in our midst? Don’t they know that predators are known to intentionally seek out places where many of their preferred targets gather in groups? That perpetrators are addicts so committed to their fantasies they’ll stop at nothing to achieve them?
Do they know that more than 99 percent of single-victim incidents are committed by males? That they are experts in rationalization who minimize their number of victims? Don’t they know that insurance companies highlight locker rooms as a high-risk area for abuse that should be carefully monitored and protected?
Predators are known to intentionally seek out places where many of their preferred targets gather in groups.
Don’t they know that one out of every four little girls will be sexually abused during childhood, and that’s without giving predators free access to them while they shower? Don’t they know that, for women who have experienced sexual trauma, finding the courage to use a locker room at all is a freaking badge of honor? That many of these women view life through a kaleidoscope of shame and suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, dissociation, poor body image, eating disorders, drug and alcohol abuse, difficulty with intimacy, and worse?
Why would people knowingly invite further exploitation by creating policies with no safeguards in place to protect them from injury? With zero screening options to ensure that biological males who enter locker rooms actually identify as female, how could a woman be sure the person staring at her wasn’t exploiting her? Why is it okay to make her wonder?
What About Women’s and Children’s Rights?“Wake up!” I want to scream. “Can’t you see what’s going on? Do something about it!”
Despite the many reports of sexual abuse and assault that exist in our world, there’s an even larger number of victims who never tell about it. The reason? They’re afraid no one will believe them. Even worse, they’re terrified of a reality they already innately know to be true: even if people did know, they wouldn’t do anything to help. They’re not worth protecting. Even silence feels better than that.
Survivors are terrified of a reality they already innately know to be true: even if people did know, they wouldn’t do anything to help.
There’s no way to make everyone happy in the situation of transgender locker room use. So the priority ought to be finding a way to keep everyone safe. I’d much rather risk hurting a smaller number of people’s feelings by asking transgender people to use a single-occupancy restroom that still offers safety than risk jeopardizing the safety of thousands of women and kids with a policy that gives would-be predators a free pass.
Is it ironic to no one that being “progressive” actually sets women’s lib back about a century? What of my right to do my darndest to insist that the first time my daughter sees the adult male form it will be because she’s chosen it, not because it’s forced upon her? What of our emotional and physical rights? Unless and until you’ve lined a bathroom door with a towel for protection, you can’t tell me the risk isn’t there.
For me, healing looks like staring at the little girl in a Polaroid photo and validating her need to be seen, heard, and protected instead of hating it. It looks like telling my story, even the parts I can never make pretty, in hopes it will help break the anonymity of survivors and create a sense of responsibility in others to act.
Don’t Let Innocents Get Hurt Before You Rethink ThisI still battle my powerlessness to do anything that feels substantial to affect change, but the good Lord didn’t bring me out of Egypt and set my feet upon a rock so I could stand idly by in the face of danger. So even if a little article or Facebook post doesn’t ultimately change the world, it’s better than silent resignation to negligence and harm. I feel a sense of urgency to invite people to consider the not-so-hidden dangers of these policies before more and more of them get cemented into place. Once that happens, the only way they’ll change is when innocent people get hurt.
Consider the not-so-hidden dangers of these policies before more and more of them get cemented into place.
Even if there aren’t hundreds of abusers rushing into locker rooms by the dozens, the question I keep asking myself is, “What if just one little girl gets hurt by this? Would that be enough to make people reconsider it?”
“And what if that little girl was me?” It’s a question I really don’t want to ask. But God’s grace has enabled me to value the face in the photo enough to realize that I have to. And even if I don’t like the answer, at least I wasn’t silent.S