From Friday the 13th of May, 2016, President Obama wrote through the Department of Education and Department of Justice to every school in the U.S. that any child can choose their own gender, by tweaking an old law signed by former President Richard Nixon; and the letter explained to every school that all sports teams, changing rooms, toilets and overnight accomadations had to be opened for both sexes! There are over 200 Cities in the U.S. that allow individuals to choose what toilet to enter. The liberals say that these new "toilet laws" are being passed so that transgenders will have rights to enter a toilet of their choice. Yet at whose expense?
The children's expense, who have a greater right to protection because they are the weakess and most vulnerable of our society.
The reason given by the Obama Government for these new anti-discrimination rights to include transgenders is so that the transgenders are not alianated and their feelings are protected. But what about my daughter's feelings when she is forced to shower with a boy who is, by all evidence, clearly a boy? Just because the boy identifies himself as a girl, does that mean my daughter's privacy rights have to be violated? - if you think about that, that is not right and is unfair!
Do all straight boys and girls have to suffer so that the transgenders feelings do not suffer? If my daughter suffers shame because her school follows the Obama Government's directive not to make transgenders suffer, that is wrong! What about my daughter's feelings when she is forced to shower with a boy who feels like he wants to be a girl and shower with the girls today? What can I say to my daughter when she comes home crying because she was forced to undress in front of a boy in her changing room because the school board in her school had decided to obey the Government. These directives are not law, yet, but that Obama letter made it explicity clear that any school which didn't comply could risk losing their Government funding for their education programs!
What about my feelings when she comes home and tells her parents that she was forced to shower with the boys? And who is going to heal her when her heart weeps with such a deep wound of shame that only God can heal her? And as a result, she has to somehow come to terms with the scars of violoation in her heart. Has the Obama Government made provisions within the law to give my daughter professional counseling, or even her parents redress who feel equally violated? The Obama Government has told all hospitals, whether religious-affiliated or not, that they have to provide a sex-change surgery operation, if requested by anyone, paid for by tax-payers money, but what about the thousands of girls or boys who will need special care as a result of these extreme policies? And does the Federdal Government even tell these kids or know the statistics that individuals who undergo self-mutilation through sex-change surgery are 20 % more likely to commit suicide? And who will pay for the possible future litigation if parents decide to sue the U.S. Government when they find their child has taken their own life?
Has these questions even been considered before President Obama sent that Friday the 13th May letter?
And what about your wive's feelings when she finds out that the person in the next booth to her in the women's toilet is doing his business standing up?
Please read the following Links:
http://truthwillprevailbychrisbriscoe.weebly.com
http://dailysignal.com/2016/06/03/6-examples-highlight-serious-problems-with-obamas-bathroom-rule/
http://dailysignal.com/2016/05/25/my-dad-was-transgender-why-i-still-think-gender-cant-be-changed/ http://dailysignal.com/2016/06/02/these-parents-pulled-their-kids-out-of-school-for-a-week-over-obamas-bathroom-directive/
A good litmus test of when anti-discrimination laws have gone too far is when it weakens or competes with existing children’s rights; which, in the case of these new “bathrooms laws” they are doing that because it allows any man who claims to be a woman to enter a woman’s tiolet, and therefore, it opens the doors to potential pedophile and pimps.
Of course, the issue of discrimination is important but when as a society we face the choice of which competing right is more important – the right to not discriminate a person’s sexual orientation versus the children’s right of keeping them safe from potential sex predators, the latter should always be priority. Therefore, we need to keep the traditional vision of our society with the traditional separate gender toilets in operation; in other words, I believe if our common sense would be allowed to prevail in this issue, we need ensure that users of all public tiolets enter their respective toilets according to their birth certificate, not according to what they feel their personal sex is. As you can imagine, people’s personal sex preferences can change from day to day! Thus, if we allow such laws, then we could have the night-marish scenario of a complete free-for-all of people chopping and changing their sexual orientation as often as the weather!
The children's expense, who have a greater right to protection because they are the weakess and most vulnerable of our society.
The reason given by the Obama Government for these new anti-discrimination rights to include transgenders is so that the transgenders are not alianated and their feelings are protected. But what about my daughter's feelings when she is forced to shower with a boy who is, by all evidence, clearly a boy? Just because the boy identifies himself as a girl, does that mean my daughter's privacy rights have to be violated? - if you think about that, that is not right and is unfair!
Do all straight boys and girls have to suffer so that the transgenders feelings do not suffer? If my daughter suffers shame because her school follows the Obama Government's directive not to make transgenders suffer, that is wrong! What about my daughter's feelings when she is forced to shower with a boy who feels like he wants to be a girl and shower with the girls today? What can I say to my daughter when she comes home crying because she was forced to undress in front of a boy in her changing room because the school board in her school had decided to obey the Government. These directives are not law, yet, but that Obama letter made it explicity clear that any school which didn't comply could risk losing their Government funding for their education programs!
What about my feelings when she comes home and tells her parents that she was forced to shower with the boys? And who is going to heal her when her heart weeps with such a deep wound of shame that only God can heal her? And as a result, she has to somehow come to terms with the scars of violoation in her heart. Has the Obama Government made provisions within the law to give my daughter professional counseling, or even her parents redress who feel equally violated? The Obama Government has told all hospitals, whether religious-affiliated or not, that they have to provide a sex-change surgery operation, if requested by anyone, paid for by tax-payers money, but what about the thousands of girls or boys who will need special care as a result of these extreme policies? And does the Federdal Government even tell these kids or know the statistics that individuals who undergo self-mutilation through sex-change surgery are 20 % more likely to commit suicide? And who will pay for the possible future litigation if parents decide to sue the U.S. Government when they find their child has taken their own life?
Has these questions even been considered before President Obama sent that Friday the 13th May letter?
And what about your wive's feelings when she finds out that the person in the next booth to her in the women's toilet is doing his business standing up?
Please read the following Links:
http://truthwillprevailbychrisbriscoe.weebly.com
http://dailysignal.com/2016/06/03/6-examples-highlight-serious-problems-with-obamas-bathroom-rule/
http://dailysignal.com/2016/05/25/my-dad-was-transgender-why-i-still-think-gender-cant-be-changed/ http://dailysignal.com/2016/06/02/these-parents-pulled-their-kids-out-of-school-for-a-week-over-obamas-bathroom-directive/
A good litmus test of when anti-discrimination laws have gone too far is when it weakens or competes with existing children’s rights; which, in the case of these new “bathrooms laws” they are doing that because it allows any man who claims to be a woman to enter a woman’s tiolet, and therefore, it opens the doors to potential pedophile and pimps.
Of course, the issue of discrimination is important but when as a society we face the choice of which competing right is more important – the right to not discriminate a person’s sexual orientation versus the children’s right of keeping them safe from potential sex predators, the latter should always be priority. Therefore, we need to keep the traditional vision of our society with the traditional separate gender toilets in operation; in other words, I believe if our common sense would be allowed to prevail in this issue, we need ensure that users of all public tiolets enter their respective toilets according to their birth certificate, not according to what they feel their personal sex is. As you can imagine, people’s personal sex preferences can change from day to day! Thus, if we allow such laws, then we could have the night-marish scenario of a complete free-for-all of people chopping and changing their sexual orientation as often as the weather!